<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Confidential Informant &#187; Whistleblower Blog Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confidentialinformant.org/category/whistleblower-blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org</link>
	<description>Covering those that speak out: confidential informants, confidential witnesses and whistleblowers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court: Whistleblower must pay Toyota $2.6M &#124; Washington &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/appeals-court-whistleblower-must-pay-toyota-2-6m-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/appeals-court-whistleblower-must-pay-toyota-2-6m-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court says a former in-house lawyer for Toyota Motor Corp. must pay the carmaker $2.6 million for disclosing confidential information. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an arbitrator&#39;s award Friday. More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court says a former in-house lawyer for Toyota Motor Corp. must pay the carmaker $2.6 million for disclosing confidential information. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an arbitrator&#39;s award Friday.</p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/2012/02/appeals-court-whistleblower-must-pay-toyota-26m/2167181'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/appeals-court-whistleblower-must-pay-toyota-2-6m-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activist Post: FDA Whistleblower Lawsuit Sparks Congressional &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/activist-post-fda-whistleblower-lawsuit-sparks-congressional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/activist-post-fda-whistleblower-lawsuit-sparks-congressional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON &#8211; February 2 &#8211; Senator Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) launched an investigation in response to a lawsuit filed by six FDA whistleblowers and documents released by the National Whistleblowers Center that show &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON &#8211; February 2 &#8211; Senator Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) launched an investigation in response to a lawsuit filed by six FDA <em>whistleblowers</em> and documents released by the National <em>Whistleblowers</em> Center that show <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.activistpost.com/2012/02/fda-whistleblower-lawsuit-sparks.html'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/activist-post-fda-whistleblower-lawsuit-sparks-congressional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator steps up scrutiny of FDA over whistleblower treatment &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/senator-steps-up-scrutiny-of-fda-over-whistleblower-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/senator-steps-up-scrutiny-of-fda-over-whistleblower-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grassley opens investigation into surveillance of emails, including correspondence with his office. More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grassley opens investigation into surveillance of emails, including correspondence with his office.</p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.govexec.com/oversight/2012/02/senator-steps-scrutiny-fda-over-whistleblower-treatment/41091/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/senator-steps-up-scrutiny-of-fda-over-whistleblower-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PharmaGossip: Whistleblower Claims Forest Bribed Study&#039;s &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/pharmagossip-whistleblower-claims-forest-bribed-studys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/pharmagossip-whistleblower-claims-forest-bribed-studys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A whistleblower&#39;s complaint from 2011 that was unsealed Jan. 20 in a federal district court alleged that Forest Pharmaceuticals paid the principal investigator of a federally funded antidepressant drug study to fix the results in &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <em>whistleblower&#39;s</em> complaint from 2011 that was unsealed Jan. 20 in a federal district court alleged that Forest Pharmaceuticals paid the principal investigator of a federally funded antidepressant drug study to fix the results in <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://pharmagossip.blogspot.com/2012/02/whistleblower-claims-forest-bribed.html'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/04/pharmagossip-whistleblower-claims-forest-bribed-studys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listen to the whistleblower &#124; Davis Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/listen-to-the-whistleblower-davis-enterprise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/listen-to-the-whistleblower-davis-enterprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My husband, David J. Thompson, is a whistleblower. A cooperative housing developer and member of the National Cooperative Hall of Fame, he is concerned about city staff not following Davis&#39; affordable housing policies that &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband, David J. Thompson, is a <em>whistleblower</em>. A cooperative housing developer and member of the National Cooperative Hall of Fame, he is concerned about city staff not following Davis&#39; affordable housing policies that <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.davisenterprise.com/opinion/letters/listen-to-the-whistleblower/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/listen-to-the-whistleblower-davis-enterprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Whistleblower Cop Carolyn Lerner Recommends Punishment &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/top-whistleblower-cop-carolyn-lerner-recommends-punishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/top-whistleblower-cop-carolyn-lerner-recommends-punishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By DANA LIEBELSON The Air Force may have failed to properly investigate and punish those responsible for the gruesome negligence at Port Mortuary&#8211;but fortunately, there&#39;s a new sheriff in town: Special Counsel Carolyn &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By DANA LIEBELSON The Air Force may have failed to properly investigate and punish those responsible for the gruesome negligence at Port Mortuary&#8211;but fortunately, there&#39;s a new sheriff in town: Special Counsel Carolyn <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2012/02/top-whistleblower-cop-carolyn-lerner-recommends-punishment-for-retaliation-at-port-mortuary.html'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/top-whistleblower-cop-carolyn-lerner-recommends-punishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Counsel Sends Whistleblower Retaliation Report to Air &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/special-counsel-sends-whistleblower-retaliation-report-to-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/special-counsel-sends-whistleblower-retaliation-report-to-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reprisal against a whistleblower is illegal under the Whistleblower Protection Act. OSC investigated the whistleblowers&#39; retaliation claims. Because OSC found retaliation, it now seeks corrective action for the whistleblowers&#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reprisal against a <em>whistleblower</em> is illegal under the <em>Whistleblower</em> Protection Act. OSC investigated the <em>whistleblowers</em>&#39; retaliation claims. Because OSC found retaliation, it now seeks corrective action for the <em>whistleblowers</em><b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://fulltextreports.com/2012/02/02/special-counsel-sends-whistleblower-retaliation-report-to-air-force/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/03/special-counsel-sends-whistleblower-retaliation-report-to-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblower protection bill clears House oversight panel &#8211; Pay &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/02/whistleblower-protection-bill-clears-house-oversight-panel-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/02/whistleblower-protection-bill-clears-house-oversight-panel-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revived measure would expand coverage and create pilot program for nondefense contractor employees. More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revived measure would expand coverage and create pilot program for nondefense contractor employees.</p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2011/11/whistleblower-protection-bill-clears-house-oversight-panel/35328/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/02/whistleblower-protection-bill-clears-house-oversight-panel-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblower Retaliation Safeguard Program &#124; Directorios Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/02/whistleblower-retaliation-safeguard-program-directorios-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/02/whistleblower-retaliation-safeguard-program-directorios-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hardest things that you yourself have to bring about to on his own is as a whistleblower. Congress additional an anti-retaliation protection with the then latest False Comments Act. So just what is a whistleblower? Sorts of a &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hardest things that you yourself have to bring about to on his own is as a <em>whistleblower</em>. Congress additional an anti-retaliation protection with the then latest False Comments Act. So just what is a <em>whistleblower</em>? Sorts of a <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.directoriosblogs.com/whistleblower-retaliation-safeguard-program/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/02/whistleblower-retaliation-safeguard-program-directorios-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblower law violated in Dover case: OSC &#8211; Marine Corps &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/01/whistleblower-law-violated-in-dover-case-osc-marine-corps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/01/whistleblower-law-violated-in-dover-case-osc-marine-corps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Blog Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Special Counsel has determined that Air Force officials violated whistleblower protection laws and retaliated against the employees that reported the mishandling of remains at the Port Mortuary at Dover Air Force &#8230; More: continued here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Special Counsel has determined that Air Force officials violated <em>whistleblower</em> protection laws and retaliated against the employees that reported the mishandling of remains at the Port Mortuary at Dover Air Force <b>&#8230;</b></p>
<p><b>More:</b> <a target='_blank' href='http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2012/01/air-force-whistleblower-law-violated-in-dover-case-013112/'> continued here </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.confidentialinformant.org/2012/02/01/whistleblower-law-violated-in-dover-case-osc-marine-corps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

